Opinion Essay - Agree or Disagree with a Statement - B2 English Writing — Exercise 1

Statement: City centres should completely ban private cars. To what extent do you agree?

Word box: Additionally – argue – disagree – For instance – hold – may – often – personally – tend – therefore

Many people 1 — choose —arguethereforedisagreeholdtendmayFor instanceAdditionallyoftenpersonally ___ that private cars create pollution and congestion in city centres and 2 — choose —arguethereforedisagreeholdtendmayFor instanceAdditionallyoftenpersonally ___ should be completely prohibited. I 3 — choose —arguethereforedisagreeholdtendmayFor instanceAdditionallyoftenpersonally ___ with a total ban. I 4 — choose —arguethereforedisagreeholdtendmayFor instanceAdditionallyoftenpersonally ___ the view that cities should reduce unnecessary car journeys while continuing to provide access for people who genuinely need it.

Firstly, car-free streets 5 — choose —arguethereforedisagreeholdtendmayFor instanceAdditionallyoftenpersonally ___ to be safer and more pleasant for pedestrians and cyclists. They 6 — choose —arguethereforedisagreeholdtendmayFor instanceAdditionallyoftenpersonally ___ also encourage visitors to spend more time in local shops and cafés. 7 — choose —arguethereforedisagreeholdtendmayFor instanceAdditionallyoftenpersonally ___, when a central shopping street has wider pavements and no through traffic, families can move around more comfortably.

8 — choose —arguethereforedisagreeholdtendmayFor instanceAdditionallyoftenpersonally ___, reducing traffic can improve air quality. People who live or work beside busy roads 9 — choose —arguethereforedisagreeholdtendmayFor instanceAdditionallyoftenpersonally ___ experience noise and harmful emissions throughout the day. Better public transport and protected cycle routes could reduce these effects without preventing every private vehicle from entering.

In conclusion, I 10 — choose —arguethereforedisagreeholdtendmayFor instanceAdditionallyoftenpersonally ___ believe that city centres should restrict car use, but essential journeys, deliveries and access for disabled residents must remain possible. A carefully managed low-traffic zone would be fairer and more practical than a complete ban.